快捷搜索:  美女    名称  as  交警  美食  润色

s常见的SCI论文审稿意见集锦

文章修回时,需要对审稿人提出的问题作出回复。但是许多新手对于审稿人注重的问题一无所知,今天我就给大家搜集了SCI论文审稿过程中审稿人提得较多的一些问题。

关于前言

  • …For instance the second sentence appears to be out of the blue. Please, provide better connections between sentences.

  • Introduction is missing some very relevant references…

  • The description of “Introduction” still needs to be improved, as some contents are redundancy while some are lacked.

  • How is their analysis different from the PLOS ONE paper?

  • At the end of the Introduction is not clear which are the innovative aspects of the research.

  • The authors state that “there are a few reports about proteins induced by water deficit”. Please be more precise.

  • How was soil sterilised? Please give some soil properties. Please give the sand: fungus ratio. How was the fungus cultivated?

  • I wonder whether in the introduction the Authors could add some more references on the already knowledge on drought stress and ECM.

  • The author should emphasize the  rational for using human mesenchymal stem cell for your study in the introduction section.

  • The aim is not clear and not well written.

  •  

关于材料与方法

  • The description of Affymetrix microarray data is not informative enough, and needs the patients’ info.

  • The experimental details are inadequate. No mention has been made on the source of seeds or the mycorrhizal inoculum.

  • There is no information on the number of replicates and the experimental design.

  •  

关于结果及图表

  • There are also structure errors, as methods are also being described in the “results” section and objectives in the “material and methods” section.

  • The caption of the tables should be more detailed…

  • There were too many tables and figures in this paper…

  • The figure is too crowded…

  • Probably the quality of the pictures in figure 3 could be improved in the last version.

  •  

关于讨论

  • Authors should avoid the first three sentences, they are part of a introduction.

  • Include an elaborate discussion explaining the exact significance of your findings.

  • Authors need to emphasize the novel insights obtained from their study.

  • Authors are suggested to validate these results using few more such entries.

  • The Discussion part was monotonous…

  • The description of this part needs to be touched up in logic…

  •  

关于结论

  • The conclusion section should revised by definite conclusion sentence.

  • Only some important and significant conclusions could be revealed in this section.

 

总结一下,前言中最主要还是要突出文章的目的性和创新性,语句之间要有相关性和连贯性,前言与文章的主题紧密联系在一起;材料方法中要尽可能的详细;结果中不能出现材料方法,图表的设计要合理、规范、清晰;讨论中既要与前人研究挂钩,又要强调文章的结果,讨论要具有逻辑性,不能与前言混为一谈;结论要简单明了,直接得出最重要的结论。另外,还有一个硬伤就是语言问题,只要是中国人投的文章,几乎每个审稿人都会毫不客气的告诉你,The paper suffers from a poorly written English… 这时你需要认真修改文章,必要时可寻求专业的SCI论文润色机构的帮助。

您可能还会对下面的文章感兴趣: